STAR-GOAT | The test stand platform for teams whose test article costs more than the software | JKI
STAR-GOAT logo
STAR-GOAT
Strategic Tester for Aerospace Research · Ground Operation Acceptance Testing

Your test article costs more than the software.
Stop carrying risk in the software.

STAR-GOAT replaces months of scratch-built LabVIEW DAQ and control code with a compliance-ready, hot-fire-proven platform your whole team can operate. Your engineers work on the article under test, not the software under it.

PROVEN: NASA arc jet (plasma wind tunnel) · commercial hot-fire campaigns · hypersonic ground test · automotive test cells

STAR-GOAT operator interface on a monitor beside the NI PXI and cRIO hardware that runs the test
30-second hot fire Customer test stand · STAR-GOAT control
DELIVERED · CLASS C NPR 7150.2D compliance
INDEPENDENT PATH RT abort & alarm chain
DETERMINISTIC · RT Millisecond sequencing
30-DAY PATH First Fire deployment

Deployed across rocket engine stands, a NASA arc jet complex, a U.S. hypersonic test range, and automotive test cells, on programs where a lost run cannot be rebooked.

NASA Ames · Astra · NI Partner Network
The build-vs-buy decision

Building test stand software from scratch is the wrong starting point.

Your engineers could build it, and that talent is why your program will succeed. The question is allocation: should they spend the next six months on the engine, or on the plumbing under it?

Scratch-built
  • 6-12 senior-engineer-months of DAQ, sequencing, logging, and abort plumbing before the first meaningful test
  • First-version code gets debugged during live tests, on hardware you cannot afford to lose
  • No NPR 7150.2 compliance artifacts; documentation from scratch routinely costs person-years
  • One author, one point of failure: the system works until that engineer leaves
  • Acquisition, control, and UI entangled in one codebase with no determinism guarantees
With STAR-GOAT
  • Installed, configured to your P&ID, crew trained, and first sequence executed in 30 days
  • Architecture already proven on NASA arc jets, commercial hot fires, and hypersonic ground test
  • NPR 7150.2 Class C compliance path delivered at NASA Ames, not just promised
  • A platform the whole team operates, with vendor support behind it and no key-person dependency
  • Client, controller, and an independent abort chain separated by design
Do the math before you staff the build A credible internal build (deterministic RT sequencing, multi-protocol acquisition, distributed sync, full-rate logging, an independent abort chain, multi-client operator stations) is $100k-$250k of senior engineering and 3-6 months of calendar, before a single compliance artifact exists. That is the real price of writing it yourself.
What a software fault actually costs

Built for programs where the next test is the expensive part.

Propulsion development

Approaching first hot fire

Your two LabVIEW-capable engineers are also your propulsion engineers. Every month they spend writing DAQ plumbing is a month not spent on the engine, while homegrown code gets its shakedown during live tests.

At stake: a slipped first-fire date · a scrapped development engine
NASA & NPR 7150.2 facilities

Class C/D software obligations

Compliance documentation from scratch routinely costs person-years, and an audit finding can stop a program. STAR-GOAT's compliance package is grounded in a delivered Class C system at NASA Ames, which is the kind of evidence that survives procurement.

At stake: person-years of documentation · a program-stopping finding
Hypersonic ground test

Unrepeatable, extreme-rate runs

Test windows on hypersonic infrastructure are scarce and booked months out. A data loss or control fault forfeits a window that takes months to rebook. STAR-GOAT is already deployed on a U.S. hypersonic test range.

At stake: a forfeited test window · months to rebook
Wind tunnel facilities

Multi-tunnel sites, one platform

Tunnel occupancy is sold by the hour, and a data fault invalidates a run your customer paid for. Multi-tunnel sites carry the pain N times over: N aging bespoke systems, N key-person dependencies. Standardize on one platform, one operator pipeline, one data format. Proven at wind-tunnel class on NASA's arc jet, a plasma wind tunnel.

At stake: invalidated occupancy hours · N incompatible legacy systems
Architecture

Separation is the safety feature.

Operator stations and the real-time controller are separate by design, with an independent abort path that no UI can stall. This is the first thing a senior test engineer looks for, and the reason first-version scratch builds fail during hot fires.

  • Client / controller separation

    Operators work at safe standoff distance, up to five remote clients per system over NI Network Streams, while the control loop runs deterministically on Windows or Linux RT, immune to anything happening in a UI.

  • Independent abort chain, including FFT resonance detection

    Dual-band alarm thresholds and RT automatic abort run on their own monitoring path. FFT-based resonance detection catches the failure mode that destroys articles before a human can react.

  • Deterministic sequencing, reviewable before it runs

    Conditional, nested sequences execute at millisecond rates on RT, authored and reviewed in configuration rather than buried in code only one engineer understands.

  • An evidence trail that survives an audit

    Full-rate TDMS logging with automatic rollover, plus event, alert, and error logs: the record you need when a customer or an auditor challenges a run.

  • Extends without touching the core

    DAQmx, XNET/CAN, OPC UA, and Modbus natively, with a validated plug-in path for custom acquisition. It is the same path our automotive deployment exercises. No rip and replace.

Functional architecture. Full detail in the whitepaper.
2000+ channels 200 kHz+ acquisition 1 kHz RT control <1 µs distributed sync
Deployments

Proven where a bad run can't be taken back.

Test article glowing in the plasma stream of a NASA arc jet facility
NASA Ames · arc jet in operation
NASA Ames · plasma wind tunnel

Arc Jet Complex: Class C, NPR 7150.2D delivered

A full data acquisition system upgrade for NASA's arc jet complex: high-enthalpy flow over instrumented articles, synchronous high-channel-count acquisition, and complete NPR 7150.2D Class C compliance. Wind-tunnel-class work, delivered and in service.

Astra rocket lifting off from Cape Canaveral, Astra logo visible on the strongback
Astra · Cape Canaveral
Astra · propulsion

Commercial rocket engine hot-fire campaigns

Astra runs its engine test program on STAR-GOAT: high-speed acquisition, deterministic control sequences, and instrumentation changes turned around without losing test days to software troubleshooting.

Named reference · Read the full Astra story
Anonymized · hypersonic

A U.S. hypersonic test range

Extreme-rate acquisition and real-time control on ground test infrastructure where security requirements narrow the vendor field and a forfeited window takes months to rebook.

Program details available under NDA
Anonymized · automotive

A major automotive test organization

The same core platform, exercised through its XNET/CAN acquisition path in automotive test cells. Proof the architecture generalizes beyond aerospace without touching the core.

Program details available under NDA
“JKI’s STAR-GOAT software has been an ideal choice for our engine test stand. Its reliability, scalability, and intuitive interface enable us to operate the entire stand with confidence while making instrumentation and control changes quickly and efficiently, without losing valuable time troubleshooting control software.”
Colin McDonald · Manager of Test Engineering, Astra

Written proof is a start. Where our customers permit it, we arrange 30-minute engineer-to-engineer reference calls under NDA as part of a standard evaluation. Ask us what is possible for your segment.

Packages

Scoped to your program's risk, not a spec sheet.

Choose by what your program is doing, not by comparing rows. Channel counts and rates are configured inside each tier.

Tier 01

Component & Subscale

Component rigs, subscale articles, and lab-bench test cells getting rigorous data without a software project.

  • Up to 200 channels · 50 kHz
  • 100 Hz control · 1 controller + 3 clients
  • 1-day installation & training
Start with a readiness review
Tier 02 · Most programs

Engine Development

Development engines and active test campaigns where a lost test day has a real price and configurations change weekly.

  • Up to 500 channels · 100 kHz
  • 500 Hz control · 1 controller + 4 clients
  • 3-day installation & training
Start with a readiness review
Tier 03

Qualification & Flight Programs

Qualification campaigns, flight hardware, and NPR 7150.2-obligated facilities where compliance evidence is the differentiator.

  • 2000+ channels · 200 kHz+
  • 1 kHz RT control · 1 controller + 5 clients
  • 1-week installation · priority support
Start with a readiness review
Entry deployment

First Fire in 30 Days

Fixed scope, fixed fee: installed, your P&ID configured, abort logic reviewed, crew trained, first sequence executed. In 30 days.

Compliance

NASA Compliance Package

NPR 7150.2 Class C/D artifacts and process, grounded in the Ames delivery. Available with STAR-GOAT or standalone for existing LabVIEW systems.

Compliance Package details
Annual program

Campaign Assurance

Priority live-window support, annual system health check, pre-campaign configuration review, and compliance documentation updates.

Multi-stand · multi-tunnel

Facility License

Standardize every stand or tunnel on one platform: one operator pipeline, one data format, one maintenance contract, with a pre-agreed expansion path.

Pricing follows your readiness review. Every quote is scoped against your channel map, control requirements, compliance obligations, and what a lost test day actually costs your program. We do not publish a rate card. All packages are available with perpetual licensing.

Next step

Book a Test Stand Readiness Review.

A free, 45-minute structured working session with a JKI test engineer. This is not a sales demo: you leave with an honest read on your build-vs-buy math and your compliance exposure, whether or not you buy anything.

What we cover in 45 min
  1. Your channel map and acquisition rates
  2. Control requirements and abort philosophy
  3. Compliance obligations (NPR 7150.2 and others)
  4. Program timeline and the build-vs-buy math
  5. Whether STAR-GOAT is actually the right fit